Intravenous immunoglobulins induce the in vitro differentiation of human B lymphocytes and the secretion of IgG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The therapeutic effects of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) in several autoimmune diseases are characterized by a decrease in pathologic autoantibody levels. Although little direct evidence has been reported in humans, the large repertoire of natural immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies in IVIGs is expected to be involved in the regulation of autoreactive B lymphocytes. In normal adult mice, IVIGs have been reported to modulate immature B cells as well as peripheral B lymphocytes through V-region connections. Studies with human serum also indicated that anti-idiotypic antibodies, present in IVIG preparations, could recognize both natural and pathologic autoantibodies. We have used an in vitro culture system to characterize the direct effect of IVIGs on human B lymphocytes. This in vitro culture system involves CD40 activation of B lymphocytes by its ligand CD154 in the presence of cytokines. In this system, addition of IVIGs decreased by 50% to 80% the expansion of B lymphocytes. This reduced expansion was due to a decrease in the proliferation rate. In addition, a portion of B lymphocytes was differentiated into IgG-secreting cells in the presence of IVIGs and the secreted IgGs were reactive with antigens such as nucleoprotamine, dsDNA, tetanus toxin, and human IgG F(ab')(2) fragments. These observations indicate that IVIGs can have direct effects on B lymphocytes and suggest that such IVIG regulation of B lymphocytes could be involved in the therapeutic effects of IVIGs in autoimmune diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".