A Different Tenor: Glimpses and Critical Reflections: Kawuki Mukasa's <i>Human Sexuality and Religion: Reframing the Problem</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Different from the tenor of academic essays, the three expositions that follow offer glimpses of and reflections on "a book that stirs ideas about how the relationship between culture and religion shapes our identities, our understanding of the nature of truth and our interpersonal relationships on matters of sexuality. Discussants were invited to submit in writing what they presented at the launch of the book. Originally four, two discussants were scholars outside the study of religion and theology, one taking a Freudian perspective. Missing here only because of the time constraints of the Journal, that perspective is mentioned to suggest the rich interdisciplinary context in which the exchanges occurred at the book launch. Mukasa holds a doctorate degree from the University of st. Michael's College, Toronto. He is the author of Belonging: Constructing a Canadian Theology of Inclusion, Sojourner and In God's Presence. He currently holds the position of Coordinator for Dialogue in Ethics and Interfaith Relations for the Anglican Church of Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".