MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039786280 · doi:10.1080/15562940903150089

Participatory-Action Research with (Im)migrant Women in Two Small Canadian Cities: Using Photovoice in Kingston and Peterborough, Ontario

2009· article· en· W2039786280 on OpenAlexaffabout
Cheryl Sutherland, Yang Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParticipatory Visual Research Methods
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoiceParticipatory action researchImmigrationCitizen journalismSociologyGender studiesFeelingAction (physics)Vulnerability (computing)Media studiesPsychologySocial psychologyPolitical scienceVisual artsAnthropologyLawArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photovoice is a participatory-action method that facilitates an opportunity for participants to tell stories about their lives using photographic images that they have created. The “Mapping Vulnerability, Picturing Place” project successfully used this method to explore the experiences of women who migrated to Canada in one of two small Canadian cities. As a part of this project, this article analyzes the nuances and differing experiences between international students and immigrant women. The results show that photovoice enables participants to convey their feelings, interpretations, and experiences in a manner to which the viewer/observer can understand and relate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0350.013
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.679
GPT teacher head0.616
Teacher spread0.064 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Immigrant & Refugee StudiesSame topicParticipatory Visual Research MethodsFrench-language works237,207