MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039844074 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.224424

Spin diffusion and the anisotropic spin-<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="1"><mml:mfrac bevelled="false"><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math>Heisenberg chain

2006· article· lv· W2039844074 on OpenAlexafffund
Jesko Sirker

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2006
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWestern Canada Research Grid
KeywordsPhysicsSpin diffusionAntiferromagnetismCondensed matter physicsSpin (aerodynamics)AnisotropyDiffusionHeisenberg modelQuantum mechanicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Measurements of the spin-lattice relaxation rate $1∕{T}_{1}$ by nuclear magnetic resonance for the one-dimensional Heisenberg antiferromagnet ${\mathrm{Sr}}_{2}\mathrm{Cu}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}$ have provided evidence for a diffusionlike contribution at finite temperature and small wave vector. By analyzing real-time data for the auto- and nearest-neighbor spin-spin correlation functions obtained by the density-matrix renormalization group I show that such a contribution indeed exists for temperatures $T&gt;J$, where $J$ is the coupling constant, but that it becomes exponentially suppressed for $T⪡J$. I present evidence that the frequency dependence of $1∕{T}_{1}$ in the Heisenberg case is smoothly connected to that in the free fermion case where the exponential suppression of the diffusionlike contribution is easily understood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207