Molecular breakpoint mapping of 6q11‐q14 interstitial deletions in seven patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interstitial deletions involving 6q11-q14 have been reported in less than 20 patients, with the breakpoints studied by G-banding alone. We report on seven patients with 6q11-q14 interstitial deletions of variable size. The breakpoints were studied by G-banding, dual-color BAC-FISH and SNP array. The results showed the molecular breakpoints differed significantly from the ones obtained from G-banding. The breakpoints studied by BAC-FISH were consistent with the ones from SNP array. Some characteristics from this cohort are consistent with previous reports, but many typical features are lacking in our patients. The cardinal features of 6q11-q14 interstitial deletions in this cohort include: umbilical hernia, hypotonia, short stature, characteristic facial features of upslanting palpebral fissures, low set and/or dysplastic ears, high arched palate, urinary tract anomalies, and skeletal/limb anomalies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".