Welfare of farmed silver foxes (<i>Vulpes vulpes</i>) housed in sibling groups in large outdoor enclosures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of housing farmed silver foxes in large outdoor enclosures with less abundant human contacts on some behavioural and physiological welfare parameters. Farmed silver fox cubs were housed either singly in traditional fox cages or in sibling groups in enclosures. Mass of adrenals, serum cortisol level after adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) administration and stress-induced hyperthermia, as well as 24-h activity measures and the number of bite scars, were used to draw conclusions on the welfare effects of housing farmed silver foxes in the two experimental housing systems. The housing system had significant effects neither on the serum cortisol level after ACTH administration nor on the mass of adrenals. This result shows that intra-group social tension and non-habituation to humans, both leading to increased long-term stress in foxes housed in large outdoor enclosures, can be partly overcome by, respectively, altering the group composition and keeping the cubs for a longer time in cage conditions with close human contact. However, a large number of bite scars and increased stress-induced hyperthermia (SIH) in the foxes housed in enclosures, indicating an acute stress response to the presence of humans, may not be overcome. Furthermore, the 24-h activity rhythm changed in the foxes housed in large enclosures resembling, especially in November, the nocturnal activity pattern of the wild red fox, indicating that the foxes in enclosures became at least to some extent feral. Key words: Activity rhythm, aggression, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, human-animal relation, stress-induced hyperthermia, Vulpes vulpes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".