MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039858380 · doi:10.1037/cjbs2006018

Construction d'une échelle d'attachement au lieu de travail: Une démarche exploratoire.

2006· article· fr· W2039858380 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPlace Attachment and Urban Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Notre article presente les resultats d'une serie de cinq etudes visant la construction et la validation d'une echelle d'attachement au lieu de travail (EALT). S'appuyant sur la Theorie de l'attachement au lieu (Place attachment) definie par Shumaker.et Taylor (1983) et concevant l'attachement au lieu de travail comme un lien affectif resultant de l'interaction dynamique entre une personne et son environnement de travail, cette mesure est une adaptation au monde professionnel de la Neighborhood Attachment scate (NAS) elaboree et validee par Bonnes, Bonaiuto, Aiello, Perugini et Ercolani (1997). Plus de 750 salaries travaillant dans differents secteurs professionnels ont participe aux differentes etudes. Les recherches preliminaires montrent que l'EALT presente une coherence interne et une stabilite temporelle acceptable. La validite de construit de cette echelle unidimensionnelle est par ailleurs confirmee.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.006
Science and technology studies0.0080.031
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it