Amorphous materials: Properties, structure, and durability: Preface to the amorphous materials special section
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| October 01, 2008 Amorphous materials: Properties, structure, and durability†: Preface to the amorphous materials special section Grant S. Henderson; Grant S. Henderson * 1Department of Geology, University of Toronto, 22 Russell Street, Toronto M5S 3B1, Canada *E-mail: henders@geology.utoronto.ca and neuville@ipgp.jussieu.fr Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Daniel R. Neuville Daniel R. Neuville 2Physique des Minéraux et Magmas CNRS-IPGP 75005 Paris, France Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Grant S. Henderson * 1Department of Geology, University of Toronto, 22 Russell Street, Toronto M5S 3B1, Canada Daniel R. Neuville 2Physique des Minéraux et Magmas CNRS-IPGP 75005 Paris, France *E-mail: henders@geology.utoronto.ca and neuville@ipgp.jussieu.fr Publisher: Mineralogical Society of America First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1945-3027 Print ISSN: 0003-004X © 2008 American Mineralogist American Mineralogist (2008) 93 (10): 1485. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2008.528 Article history First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Grant S. Henderson, Daniel R. Neuville; Amorphous materials: Properties, structure, and durability: Preface to the amorphous materials special section. American Mineralogist 2008;; 93 (10): 1485. doi: https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2008.528 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyAmerican Mineralogist Search Advanced Search This special issue of American Mineralogist focuses on the "Structure and Properties of Silicate Melts and Fluids," and follows the inaugural meeting "Frontiers in Mineral Sciences 2007" held in Cambridge between June 26–28, 2007 by the four mineralogical societies: the Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the Mineralogical Society of America, the Mineralogical Association of Canada, and the Société Française de Minéralogie et de Cristallographie. Plans for this special issue were initiated during the conference, and we invited all the participants, as well as additional scientists, to contribute papers on aspects of their research related to the theme of... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.047 | 0.022 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".