Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quelle vue d'ensemble se dégage des travaux concernant le Nord-du- Québec et qui présentent un intérêt pour l'historiographie? Dans le but d'établir un lien entre l'histoire de cette région nordique et celle du sud du Québec, une analyse des principaux travaux consacrés aux fronts pionniers de la colonisation euroquébécoise est d'abord proposée pour constater que ceux-ci se limitent généralement aux franges de l'oekoumène agricole. Plus au nord, les travaux à caractère historique ont surtout été le fait d'anthropologues, de géographes et de sociologues. Les quelques historiens qui se sont intéressés au Nord-du-Québec ont surtout concentré leurs recherches sur des questions reliées à la traite des fourrures. L'historiographie du Nord apparaît donc distincte et peu intégrée à celle du Sud, et elle dépend largement de disciplines autres que l'histoire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".