MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039886776 · doi:10.1103/physreve.78.021604

Effects of long jumps, reversible aggregation, and Meyer-Neldel rule on submonolayer epitaxial growth

2008· article· en· W2039886776 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandre Beausoleil, P. Desjardins, Alain Rochefort

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalRegroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de Pointe
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinetic Monte CarloEpitaxyDiffusionMaterials scienceArrhenius equationKinetic energyCondensed matter physicsJumpThermodynamicsKineticsMonte Carlo methodChemical physicsNanotechnologyPhysicsMathematicsQuantum mechanicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We demonstrate, using kinetic Monte Carlo simulations of submonolayer epitaxial growth, that long jumps and reversible aggregation have a major impact on the evolution of island morphologies. Long jumps are responsible for a supra-Arrhenius behavior of the effective diffusion coefficient as the attachment and detachment kinetics give rise to a bimodal island size distribution that depends on temperature and long jump extent limits. As the islands density increases with temperature, the average size of stable islands reaches a maximum before decreasing. We have also observed that the diffusion coefficient cannot be used alone to predict the evolution of island sizes and morphologies, the relative rate of each process having a major importance. Our theoretical developments are of direct relevance for materials systems such as Au, Pd, Ag, Cu, Ni, H/Si , H/W(110), Co/Ru , and Co/Ru(S), that are known for exhibiting a compensation effect that cannot be contained within experimental uncertainties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.682

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactionsFrench-language works237,207