MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

REMOTE STABILIZATION OF A CLASS OF LINEAR SYSTEMS AND ITS ROBUST STABILITY ANALYSIS

2007· article· en· W2039908878 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueControl and Intelligent Systems · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStability (learning theory)Class (philosophy)Control theory (sociology)MathematicsComputer scienceApplied mathematicsArtificial intelligenceMachine learningControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the stabilization of a class of time delayed remote control systems is first analysed and then designed, using linear matrix inequality techniques. Its robust design with respect to system parametric uncertainties and its robust analysis with respect to nonlinear additive uncertainties as well as time delay uncertainties are discussed. The system under investigation is a cascade system with two subsystems controlled by a remote controller with static gains. The motivation of this work is to explore the problem of distributed networked control systems beginning with the discussion of a simple cascade system. Static controller designs based on delay-dependent stability conditions are presented and are proven to be less conservative than conventional designs. This design is then extended where parametric uncertainties exist. Furthermore, sufficient stability conditions are derived for the system with norm-bounded nonlinear additive uncertainties and time delay variations. Finally, simulation examples are presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.419
Threshold uncertainty score0.874

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it