Multiple-Stress Model for One-Shot Device Testing Data Under Exponential Distribution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Left- and right-censored life time data arise naturally in one-shot device testing. An experimenter is often interested in identifying the effects of several stress variables on the lifetime of a device, and furthermore multiple-stress experiments controlling simultaneously several variables, result in reducing the experimental time as well as the cost of the experiment. Here, we present an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for developing inference on the reliability at a specific time, as well as the mean lifetime of the device based on one-shot device testing data under the exponential distribution when there are multiple stress factors. We use the log-linear link function for this purpose. Unlike in the typical EM algorithm, it is not necessary to obtain maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs) of the parameters at each step of the iteration. By using the one-step Newton-Raphson method, we observe that the convergence occurs quickly. We also use the jackknife technique to reduce the bias of the estimate obtained from the EM algorithm. In addition, we discuss the construction of confidence intervals for some reliability characteristics by using the asymptotic properties of the MLEs based on the observed Fisher information matrix, as well as by the jackknife technique, the parametric bootstrap methods, and a transformation technique. Finally, we present an example to illustrate all the inferential methods developed here.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.032 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".