MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039911431 · doi:10.1121/1.2933593

Building Isolation Design for Noise Critical Applications

2008· article· en· W2039911431 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
George P. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise (video)Vibration isolationIsolation (microbiology)VibrationAcousticsNoise reductionComputer scienceStructural engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Because it is a complex, multi-degree-of-freedom system, the success of a building isolation installation depends on careful selection of a number of design factors. The new Toronto Opera House, the Four Seasons Centre for the Performing Arts, opened in June 2006, is located directly adjacent to a surface light rail trackway and to a subway rail transit system. The results characterized as "the quietest Opera House in the world" demonstrate that groundborne noise and vibration is not a factor precluding the use of a noisy site for a noise-sensitive facility. Measurement of the existing groundborne noise provided the basis to determine the required noise reduction. Very stiff and massive foundation elements with stiff and massive structure directly above the isolation bearings allows the isolation design to be simplified to a single-degree-of-freedom system for deriving the performance of the isolation at low frequencies. Natural rubber bearings with thickness adjusted to achieve a specific amount of insertion loss for the structure-borne noise can be used to determine the expected performance at frequencies above 50-80 Hz. Isolation system design parameters for the new 2000-seat Opera House Performance Hall and graphical results from vibration and noise projections and tests are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207