MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039914770 · doi:10.1117/12.2074784

Flexible grid spacing using Nyquist-shaped channels for undersea transmission

2014· article· en· W2039914770 on OpenAlexaff
P. Mehta, Jennifer Gaudette, J. Li

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsCiena (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase-shift keyingWavelength-division multiplexingSymbol rateDispersion (optics)Electronic engineeringTransmission (telecommunications)Channel spacingQuadrature amplitude modulationOpticsComputer scienceTelecommunicationsBit error ratePhysicsEngineeringChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we experimentally study DC-PM-BPSK, PM-QPSK, and PM-16QAM at 35 Gbaud for undersea transmission in a WDM environment with frequency spacing ranging from 50 GHz (DWDM) to 33 GHz (Super-Nyquist). The experimental study focuses on noise, linear cross-talk, and nonlinear tolerance in two undersea applications: (1) Legacy dispersion-managed submarine cables up to 5,000 km in length and (2) New uncompensated submarine cables up to 12,500 km in length. We experimentally demonstrate that a reduction in frequency spacing below the symbol rate can be achieved, and quantify the performance penalties. We also show a comparison of performance and reach between legacy dispersion-managed applications, and new uncompensated applications, as the frequency spacing is reduced below the symbol rate. It is shown that the constellation and line system dispersion map have a significant impact on the tolerance to linear and nonlinear interference generated by narrow frequency spacing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207