Mapping of Air Leakage in Exterior Wall Assemblies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A full-scale wood frame test hut with nine wall specimens, typical of low-rise residential construction in the province of Quebec, was built inside an environmental chamber. This test hut was subjected to 66 days of simulated winter and 47 days of late spring climatic conditions to verify the feasibility of different methods of mapping and representing graphically air exfiltration. Through a better understanding of the movement of air through the envelope, the risks related to moisture condensation within the envelope for different wall compositions can be better ascertained. The air leakage pattern characterization methods implemented were two-dimensional grid moisture content monitoring and three-dimensional grid temperature monitoring. The moisture content and temperature data were presented in a graphic form, using isohygrons and isotherms. Temperatures without the impact of air leakage were also calculated using a three-dimensional conductive heat transfer model. The air leakage pattern characterization methods and the resulting moisture and temperature maps are presented and discussed herein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it