Modes of extinction in two Devonian ostracode faunas of western Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of a prominent Middle Devonian Eifelian and an Upper Devonian Frasnian ostracode faunal sequence of western Canada is used to trace their evolutionary pathways, to illustrate evolutionary dynamics, and to evaluate the most probable causes and implications of the major and minor changes, which are clearly expressed in two sets of charts. A connection between sedimentary transgressiveregressive and evolutionary cycles is evident and documented in sample-for-sample accounts. Major changes in sea level were the primary cause for the most obvious breaks and trends in the faunal sequences and were responsible for the cyclic development of both the sedimentary and ostracode records. In contrast, numerous subordinate faunal breaks impart a distinctly punctuated pattern to both extinction and speciation pathways. Their regular spacing point to rhythmic influences that are interpreted to reflect primarily temperature fluctuations to which ostracodes are known to react in direct and indirect ways. In turn, the periodicity of the changes falls within the time frame of the Milankovitch Effect or to any one, or a combination, of its three variables. By combining the overall cyclic development with the punctuated progression of both extinction and speciation events in an "event-stratigraphic chart," a blueprint of the evolutionary dynamics emerges, which can be directly applied in sequence-stratigraphic reconstructions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".