Évaluation de la croissance et des dommages hivernaux de six cultivars de spirées japonaises en réponse aux diverses conditions climatiques du nord-est canadien
Bibliographic record
Abstract
De jeunes plants de cinq cultivars de Spiraea japonica L. et d'un cultivar de Spiraea nipponica Maxim. ont ete implantes entre 1986 et 1994 dans des sites representant differentes zones climatiques du nord-est canadien (2 a 5). Ces plants ont ete observes pendant cinq annees dans le but de verifier leur potentiel de tolerance aux conditions climatiques. Les dommages hivernaux observes chaque printemps montrent que le potentiel d'acclimatation aux conditions hivernales de Spiraea japonica differe au sein de ses cultivars. Le cultivar Little Princess a demontre un potentiel de survie superieur aux autres cultivars, alors que Crispa a ete le plus fortement endommage. Les dommages legers se sont produits sur tous les cultivars, sans relation avec la zone climatique alors que les dommages severes se sont produits surtout sur le cultivar Shirobana affectant egalement le cultivar Crispa et S. nipponica 'Snowmound'. La duree de la floraison a fortement diminue dans les sites les plus froids comparativement aux sites plus chauds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".