Social Organization and Mating System of Macaca Fascicularis (Long Tailed Macaques)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Long tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) are organized into multi-male/multi-female groups have a stronghierarchical ties with each others. The data collected in present study was random and continuous sampling data.It was depicted from present study that the alpha male exhibit significant dominance for the behaviour offighting (p<0.05), eating (p<0.05) and grooming (received) (p<0.05). Other behaviours grooming (given),attacking and protection were observed higher in beta male. Furthermore, the male and female socialrelationships were also assessed and compared to the other members of the group. The behaviors of males wasfound significant for the aggression (p<0.028), approach (p<0.002) and reconciliation (p<0.01), while observedsignificant difference in the behavior of grooming (p<0.012), biting (p<0.016), sex (p<0.031), submission(p<0.004) and baby care (p<0.01) in females respectively. It is concluded that the Macaca fascicularis bound inhierarchical system and mating structure showed that the male and female mate with multiple partnerssuggesting that mating is composed on polyandry and polygamy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".