Social Organization and Mating System of Macaca Fascicularis (Long Tailed Macaques)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Long tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) are organized into multi-male/multi-female groups have a stronghierarchical ties with each others. The data collected in present study was random and continuous sampling data.It was depicted from present study that the alpha male exhibit significant dominance for the behaviour offighting (p<0.05), eating (p<0.05) and grooming (received) (p<0.05). Other behaviours grooming (given),attacking and protection were observed higher in beta male. Furthermore, the male and female socialrelationships were also assessed and compared to the other members of the group. The behaviors of males wasfound significant for the aggression (p<0.028), approach (p<0.002) and reconciliation (p<0.01), while observedsignificant difference in the behavior of grooming (p<0.012), biting (p<0.016), sex (p<0.031), submission(p<0.004) and baby care (p<0.01) in females respectively. It is concluded that the Macaca fascicularis bound inhierarchical system and mating structure showed that the male and female mate with multiple partnerssuggesting that mating is composed on polyandry and polygamy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".