Empirical tight-binding calculations of the electronic structure of dilute III–V–N semiconductor alloys
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present empirical tight-binding (TB) calculations of the electronic structure of GaP1−xNx and InyGa1−yAs1−xNx alloys with low nitrogen content (x<0.05) over the entire Brillouin zone. Following the method recently developed for GaAs1−xNx [Shtinkov et al., Phys. Rev. B 67, 081202 (2003)], we add to the TB basis an additional anion s orbital (sN) in order to account for the N-induced change of the electronic structure. The band structures of GaP1−xNx and InyGa1−yAs1−xNx are calculated using an sp3d5s*sN TB parametrization. Our TB results are in excellent agreement with experimental and other theoretical data without introducing any additional fitting parameters, demonstrating that the developed method is a promising tool for modeling a wide range of dilute nitride materials and heterostructures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".