MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040096138 · doi:10.1061/40737(2004)468

Delineation of Contamination Spread Potential over Extended Time Modeling

2004· article· en· W2040096138 on OpenAlexaff
F. J.-C. Bouchart, Paul Jowitt, Stephen Cavill

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Transitions in Water and Environmental Resources Management · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTRACE (psycholinguistics)Matrix (chemical analysis)Task (project management)Convolution (computer science)NoticeContaminationMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceMathematicsEngineeringSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The delineation of contamination spread is a critical task in responding to an emergency involving water quality. Conventional modeling techniques can be used to trace the movement of a contaminant through a distribution network. However, this trace is valid only for the demand load specified in the extended time simulation. If the actual demand loads across the network change as a result of, for example, a public health notice, then the actual spread of the contaminant may be significantly different — making containment much more difficult. The connectivity matrix approach overcomes this problem of limited real-time knowledge of demands, yielding a delineation of the spread potential consistent with the cautionary principle of starting with the worst possible scenario. One remaining challenge to the use of the connectivity modelis that the matrix is defined for a single point in time, whereas contamination spread is time dependent. The current paper presents two alternative methods to address changes in the connectivity over time. The first of these methods relies on the convolution of connectivity matrices over time, while the second approach relies on a decay mechanism to transition from one connectivity matrix to the next.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.274
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Transitions in Water and Environmental Resources ManagementSame topicInfrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability AnalysisFrench-language works237,207