POTENTIAL SEX PHEROMONE COMPONENTS OF THE SADDLED PROMINENT (LEPIDOPTERA: NOTODONTIDAE)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Significant outbreaks of saddled prominent, Heterocampa guttivitta (Walker), have been recorded in northern hardwood stands throughout the northeastern United States since 1907 and were first noted in Ontario in 1938 (Martinat and Allen 1988). The insect overwinters as a pupa beneath litter, adult emergence begins in late May and peaks in mid-June, and oviposition activity ends in early July. Consequently, the major impact of defoliation usually occurs in late summer feeding. Principal hosts are sugar maple, Acer saccharum Marsh. (Aceraceae), American beech, Fagus grandifolia (Ehrh.) (Fagaceae), and yellow birch, Betula alleghaniensis Britton (Betulaceae) (Rush and Allen 1987). Two successive years of severe (>75%) defoliation of sugar maple result in significant growth loss (Bauce and Allen 1991), and heavy mortality may occur to understory sugar maple (Grimble and Newel1 1973). The quantity and sugar content of sugar maple sap are dramatically reduced the spring following heavy (>50%) defoliation (Magasi 1981; Handy 1968). Heavy to severe defoliation may cause crown dieback and defoliation and, in concert with other stresses, may initiate maple decline (Giese et al. 1964). Currently, monitoring and evaluation of saddled prominent populations must rely on egg sampling (Grimble and Kasile 1974), a time-consuming process that is inconvenient for survey personnel and landowners. A sex pheromone has not been identified for this species (nor for any other North American Notodontidae) and would be a potentially useful tool for detecting incipient outbreaks, predicting population levels, and evaluating population trends.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".