Computing a Stationary Base-Stock Policy for a Finite Horizon Stochastic Inventory Problem with Non-linear Shortage Costs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We consider a periodic-review stochastic inventory problem in which demands for a single product in each of a finite number of periods are independent and identically distributed random variables. We analyze the case where shortages (stockouts) are penalized via fixed and proportional costs simultaneously. For this problem, due to the finiteness of the planning horizon and non-linearity of the shortage costs, computing the optimal inventory policy requires a substantial effort as noted in the previous literature. Hence, our paper is aimed at reducing this computational burden. As a resolution, we propose to compute “the best stationary policy.” To this end, we restrict our attention to the class of stationary base-stock policies, and show that the multi-period, stochastic, dynamic problem at hand can be reduced to a deterministic, static equivalent. Using this important result, we introduce a model for computing an optimal stationary base-stock policy for the finite horizon problem under consideration. Fundamental analytic conclusions, some numerical examples, and related research findings are also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it