Antibiotic prophylaxis for pulmonary resection of lung cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
肺癌手術時において，予防的抗生剤を4日間投与した群（A群66例）と術当日のみに抗生剤投与した群（B群87例）を比較し，1日投与の効果・安全性を検討した．両群は患者背景，術前導入療法実施，術式・VATSの割合に差がなく，手術時間・出血量，術後ICU入室例数も差はみられなかった．1週間以上続く気漏はA/B群6/10例にみられ，平均ドレナージ期間はA/B群3.9/4.0日，いずれも両群間に有意差はなかった．術後合併症はA/B群で17/23例みられ，このうち術後肺炎はA/B群3/1例に生じ，起炎菌に感受性のある抗生剤を追加投与した．ドレーン留置延長による抗生剤の追加投与は両群ともに行わなかったが，創感染・膿胸は両群に発生しなかった．retrospectiveな検討だが，肺癌手術後の予防的抗生剤投与は術当日のみでも十分であることが示唆された．
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".