Leaf area index change in ice-storm-damaged sugar maple stands
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Changes in Leaf Area Index (LAI) between the summers of 1999 and 2000 were measured using the TRAC optical instrument in sugar maple stands damaged by the 1998 ice storm. Changes were determined to be significant if they were greater than the 95% bounds of the instrument precision. They were evaluated in relation to 1998 canopy damage estimates, 1999 stand treatments (lime, fertilizer, lime + fertilizer, herbicide, none), and 1999 understory vegetation cover. Results show that LAI change is significantly related to overstory damage, and understory abundance in the 0–7-m height range. Plot treatments were not related to these LAI changes, possibly due to the short time interval between application and LAI measurement. Keywords: forest damage, ice storm, leaf area index, optical instruments, TRAC
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it