MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040179232 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2008.4564751

Implementation of v-cave display system using the Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine

2008· article· en· W2040179232 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Patrick Gavigan, Trevor Pearce

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAugmented Reality Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRendering (computer graphics)Software renderingComputer graphics (images)Computer scienceTiled renderingGraphicsAlternate frame renderingReal-time renderingGraphics pipelineComputer graphics2D computer graphics3D computer graphicsReal-time computer graphics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper outlines the design of an inexpensive v-cave display system using the open source object-oriented graphics rendering engine. This system utilizes the existing graphics rendering pipeline to map the graphics to the screen such that they are projected in perspective. This is done by controlling the aspect ratio of the frustums used to form the view volume and by applying transformations to the projection matrix used by OGRE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicAugmented Reality ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207