MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040193738 · doi:10.1097/mnh.0b013e328343f526

Advancement in hypertension pathogenesis: some new concepts

2011· letter· en· W2040193738 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rhian M. Touyz

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Nephrology & Hypertension · 2011
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceResearch centreMedicineResearch centerOptometryFamily medicinePathologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kidney Research Center, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Correspondence to Rhian M. Touyz, MD, PhD, Canada Research Chair in Hypertension, Kidney Research Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, #2513, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada Tel: +1 613 562 5800 x8241; fax: +1 613 562 5487; e-mail: [email protected]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.011
Scholarly communication0.0060.018
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0160.029
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Nephrology & HypertensionSame topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesFrench-language works237,207