MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040197524 · doi:10.7202/1000962ar

Le cinéma des premiers temps à Montréal et l’institution du théâtre

2011· article· fr· W2040197524 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jean-Marc Larrue

Bibliographic record

VenueCinémas Revue d études cinématographiques · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsCollège de Valleyfield
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article propose un tableau précis des liens étroits qui unirent le cinéma des premiers temps à l’institution théâtrale montréalaise existante. À cette époque, le cinéma joue un rôle central dans les stratégies d’émergence du théâtre francophone qui s’éloigne alors du théâtre anglophone, son rival issu de la ville de New York, tout autant qu’il joue un rôle d’attrait dans un contexte de vive concurrence. Non seulement cela donne-t-il lieu à des scènes mixtes (théâtrales et cinématographiques), mais également à une interprétation plus profonde de deux arts qui aboutit aux premières manifestations d’un cinéma-théâtre québécois.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0130.007
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCinémas Revue d études cinématographiquesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207