MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Role of probiotics in the modulation of intestinal infections and inflammation

2003· article· en· W2040244759 on OpenAlexaff
David R. Mack, Sylvie Lebel

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Gastroenterology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProbiotics and Fermented Foods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProbioticImmune systemBiologyImmunologyDiseaseInnate immune systemInflammationMicrobiologyPathogenesisAntibioticsBacteriaMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Using microorganisms to influence positively the course of an illness caused by injurious microorganisms is an approach with mounting clinical evidence showing efficacy. Whereas antibiotics will remain an important therapeutic option, there are limitations and problems to their increasing and chronic usage, and probiotics offer a strategy to reduce antibiotic usage. Increasingly, it has become clear that the mechanisms whereby probiotics can impact in intestinal diseases involve a large repertoire of responses. This review summarizes recent findings on how probiotics may effect benefit through interactions with host eukaryotic cells. RECENT FINDINGS: Limiting the access of microbes associated with the development of disease to host mucosal surfaces and altering the responses of host to microbial insults are potential mechanisms whereby probiotics can influence the pathogenesis of disease. Evidence is accumulating that live, viable probiotic organisms diminish accessibility to intestinal epithelial cell; however, the mucosal exclusion is not through direct blockage of shared epithelial receptors between probiotic microbes and pathogenic organisms. Modulation of mucosal defenses such as innate protective mechanisms, enhanced epithelial cell survival, and immune responses have all been shown to have potential in aiding in these actions. Intestinal epithelial cell adherence influences response and, as such, appears to be necessary but may not be wholly sufficient, because soluble bacterial factors have been reported to effect modulation of immune and nonimmune responses of eukaryotic cells. SUMMARY: There is a considerable repertoire of responses potentially responsible for the effects of probiotics, and these responses appear to involve a complex interplay between the microbes of the intestinal tract and the cells of the host. Continued work can be expected to further the understanding of the mechanisms involved, and more work is needed to determine the relative clinical importance of each of the phenomena. These studies are expected to help direct the most efficacious use of probiotics for inflammatory conditions arising from the intestinal tract.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in GastroenterologySame topicProbiotics and Fermented FoodsFrench-language works237,207