MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040266997 · doi:10.2217/14750708.5.5.685

Dabigatran etexilate: an oral direct thrombin inhibitor

2008· article· en· W2040266997 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ola E. Dahl

Bibliographic record

VenueTherapy · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDabigatranMedicineDirect thrombin inhibitorTolerabilityAtrial fibrillationPulmonary embolismThrombosisRivaroxabanDiscovery and development of direct thrombin inhibitorsDeep veinAnticoagulantStroke (engine)Venous thrombosisWarfarinIntensive care medicineInternal medicineThrombinAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dabigatran etexilate is a direct thrombin inhibitor that offers potential advantages over existing anticoagulants for the prevention and treatment of venous and arterial thrombosis. It is administered orally, has a rapid onset of action, a predictable anticoagulant effect and does not require laboratory monitoring. Trial results indicate that dabigatran etexilate has similar efficacy, risk of bleeding and tolerability compared with currently used anticoagulants. Dabigatran etexilate is approved in Europe and Canada for the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing hip- and kneereplacement surgery. Trials involving more than 40,000 patients are evaluating the safety and efficacy of dabigatran etexilate for the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, primary and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism, prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, and prevention of cardiac events in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The drug may have its greatest impact in providing a much-needed and attractive alternative to vitamin K antagonists.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score0.785

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTherapySame topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207