Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article porte sur un forum de discussion du site Al-Arabiya et sur la succession de commentaires qu’une dépêche à propos d’incidents confessionnels à Esna, en Egypte, y a suscitée. Il aborde la question de l’identité en tant qu’elle est constitutive de cette succession de commentaires en même temps qu’elle en est l’objet. Mais l’identité appartient aussi aux éléments constitutifs de l’activité virtuelle elle-même et s’affiche pour caractériser autrui, s’auto-caractériser et lier des droits et obligations à ces actes catégoriels. À ce titre, elle s’inscrit dans la normativité de la cognition pratique, c’est-à-dire la cognition telle que saisie en acte. L’article s’attache à décrire les formes concrètes d’ordonnancement du comportement conceptuel, communicationnel, relationnel et instrumental des gens, tel qu’il se déploie in situ sur ce forum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".