De la négociation à l’imposition : le risque d’un retour en arrière, d’un retour au mépris
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’évolution des relations entre autochtones et allochtones depuis les années 1970 fait croire à plusieurs que ces relations ne peuvent aller qu’en s’améliorant. Néanmoins, l’État canadien ne s’est toujours pas sorti de la relation coloniale vis-à-vis des Premières Nations, relation qui impliqua historiquement de nombreuses manifestations de mépris à leur endroit, mépris qui fut souvent invisible aux yeux de ceux qui le portaient et se croyaient bien intentionnés. Dans une analyse fonctionnelle également influencée par la phénoménologie morale d’Axel Honneth, l’auteur expose dans ce texte une méthode heuristique permettant de repérer le mépris par ses fonctions, sa dynamique et ses conséquences, plutôt que par un contenu narratif qui change selon les époques afin de correspondre au cadre normatif ambiant. Il utilise finalement cette méthode afin d’examiner certains discours et agissements contemporains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".