MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040307728 · doi:10.1021/jp064312l

Dynamic Instabilities and Mechanism of the Electrochemical Oxidation of Thiosulfate

2006· article· en· W2040307728 on OpenAlexaff
Zhanhe Du, Qingyu Gao, Jiamin Feng, Yongchao Lu, Jichang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChronoamperometryElectrochemistryDielectric spectroscopyThiosulfateChemistryElectron transferRedoxGalvanic cellAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ElectrodeChemical physicsInorganic chemistryPhysical chemistryCyclic voltammetrySulfur

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electrochemical oxidation of thiosulfate is revealed to have two distinct oscillatory regimes in both linear potential and galvanic voltammograms, where various nonlinear behaviors such as period-2, mixed-mode and quasi-periodic oscillations, and chaos are observed under potentiostatic or galvanostatic conditions. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and iR compensation characterization indicate that, depending on the operating conditions, the system could be either a strictly potentiostatic oscillator or an S-shaped negative differential resistance oscillator. Chronoamperometry measurements reveal that the first oscillatory process involves a single-electron transfer, whereas within the second oscillatory regime the average number of electrons transferred is around 3.8. Measurements with capillary electrophoresis and chemical methods illustrate that the oxidation products include S2O6(2-), S4O6(2-), S5O6(2-), S3O6(2-), and SO4(2-).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207