MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040308430 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.tim2013-c35

Abstract C35: The development of metastatic mouse models of neuroblastoma to bone and brain to identify the molecular mechanisms governing metastasis

2013· article· en· W2040308430 on OpenAlexaff
Kelly E. Fathers, Samar Mouaaz, Constanza Rioseco, Anna Mourskaia, Ronald G. Blasberg, Meredith S. Irwin, Peter M. Siegel, David R. Kaplan

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioluminescence imagingNeuroblastomaMetastasisLuciferasePathologyIn vivoMedicineBone marrowCancer researchEx vivoBone metastasisPrimary tumorLymphCancerBiologyCell cultureInternal medicineTransfection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Metastasis is a key reason for the lack of success in treating children with neuroblastoma (NB). Over 50% of patients present with metastatic lesions in the bone, brain, liver and lymph nodes, with a high fatality rate for patients that relapse with those metastases. A better understanding of the molecular processes defining the complexity and multi-step nature of NB dissemination is required for the development of effective treatments. To date, there is no NB model that quantitatively and reproducibly metastasizes to bone and brain. Thus, we developed novel metastatic mouse models of neuroblastoma to bone and brain through in vivo selection to enhance metastatic capability. SK-N-AS, derived from a bone marrow metastasis, and IMR-32, a MYCN-amplified line derived from an abdominal mass, were tagged for in vivo monitoring using a triple reporter (TR) encoding TK, GFP and firefly luciferase, which allows for nuclear imaging, FACs analysis, and whole body bioluminescence. Reporter expression was confirmed by double sorting for GFP and testing for luciferase activity. Cells were introduced into the blood stream of NOD/SCID mice through intra-cardiac injection, and monitored bi-weekly using bioluminescence. SK-N-ASTR cells metastasized to the adrenal gland (87%, 13/15 animals) and bone (mandible, hindlimbs, 67%, 10/15 animals), whereas IMR-32TR cells metastasized to bone (100%, 10/10 animals) and brain (40%, 4/10 animals). Metastatic lesions were confirmed by ex-vivo bioluminescence, 3D bioluminescence, MRI or micro-CT. Cells from specific metastatic sites of individual mice were isolated, expanded in culture, GFP sorted and injected into a second cohort of mice. Several of the SK-N-ASTR re-injected cell lines derived from bone exhibited enhanced metastasis after one round of in vivo selection, with 100% metastasis to bone and the adrenal gland (a common location of primary NB tumours) and up to 60% metastasis to brain, as confirmed by MRI. Subsequently, these animals had a decreased overall survival rate of approximately 43 days relative to the parental cell line, of 69 days. The metastatic sub-populations do not proliferate at higher rates than the parental cell line, as assessed by BrdU labeling. Thus, the enhanced metastasis observed in vivo is not due to a faster growth rate, but rather selection of metastasis promoting functions. This is supported by the finding that the metastatic SK-N-ASTR sub-populations also exhibited enhanced migration and invasion toward serum, as assessed using boyden chambers, compared to the parental line. These sub-populations are being characterized to identify the molecular mechanisms governing metastasis. Metastasis to brain and bone is an often fatal event in children with newly diagnosed and recurrent NB. We have developed the first reproducible and efficient NB metastatic mouse model to identify novel genes and signalling proteins regulating metastasis, and to identify drug candidates that suppress metastatic growth. Citation Format: Kelly E. Fathers, Samar Mouaaz, Constanza Rioseco, Anna Mourskaia, Ronald Blasberg, Meredith Irwin, Peter Siegel, David Kaplan. The development of metastatic mouse models of neuroblastoma to bone and brain to identify the molecular mechanisms governing metastasis. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Tumor Invasion and Metastasis; Jan 20-23, 2013; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(3 Suppl):Abstract nr C35.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207