MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040308878 · doi:10.1177/193229681300700326

Current State of Diabetes Technology Clinics and Programs in the United States

2013· letter· en· W2040308878 on OpenAlexaff
Patty Scalzo, Ananda Basu, Yogish C. Kudva

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Diabetes Science and Technology · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
KeywordsInsulin pumpInsulinDiabetes mellitusInsulin deliveryType 1 diabetesContinuous glucose monitoringMedicineBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringClosed loopArtificial pancreasInternal medicineIntensive care medicineEndocrinologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The number of people who use diabetes technologies, such as insulin pumps and continuous glucose sensors, continues to rise. Whereas 130,000 people with type 1 diabetes used an insulin pump in 2002, by 2007 this number had risen to approximately 375,000 people.1 Over the next decade, when the insulin pump and glucose sensor are combined in a communicative manner in which the pump will modify insulin delivery based on continuous glucose results (closed loop), the volume of patients on insulin pumps are expected to increase dramatically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Diabetes Science and TechnologySame topicDiabetes Management and ResearchFrench-language works237,207