MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040310403 · doi:10.1109/isse.2007.4432830

Survey of wavelet based denoising filter design

2007· article· en· W2040310403 on OpenAlexaff
C. Gavrincea, Alin Tisan, Atilla Buchman, Stefan Oniga

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveletNoise reductionComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayStep detectionFilter (signal processing)Wavelet transformNoise (video)SIGNAL (programming language)Signal processingVideo denoisingElectronic engineeringArtificial intelligenceDigital signal processingComputer hardwareComputer visionEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents theoretical and practical aspects in conjunction with hardware implementation of wavelet based denoising filters. The wavelets can tackle the denoising problem optimally from the point of view that the wavelet based denoising attempts to remove whatever noise is present and retain whatever signal is present regardless to the frequency content of the signal. In the field of designing signal processing systems, "time to market" represents a key factor. Hardware implementation using field programmable gate arrays (FPGA) can reduce time to market for signal processing systems. The paper analyzes and compares different solution for hardware implementation of wavelet based denoising filters using FPGAs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207