Bibliographic record
Abstract
More than fifty years after his violent death in 1961, Ernest Hemingway remains a writer of gigantic proportions. He has a faithful following among high school and university readers, bolstered by a popular culture industry of Hollywood adaptations, biopics, documentaries, and fictionalized expat films: most recently, Hemingway and Gellhorn (2012), an action-packed film starring Clive Owen and Nicole Kidman; Woody Allen’s summer blockbuster comedy Midnight in Paris (2011); Greta Schiller’s documentary Paris Was A Woman (1996); and Alan Rudolph’s The Moderns (1988). What could three new expat books—two of them volumes of largely unpublished letters by Hemingway and by Sylvia Beach, along with a new fictional portrait of Hemingway’s first marriage to Hadley Richardson—possibly add to this rich reputation? In a word, plenty, as newly published sources become available, and as the women contributors to Modernism move from the sidelines into the limelight, claiming their own experiences and reconfiguring American identity in post-war Paris. The combined insights of these three books are manifold and will resonate for years to come.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.014 | 0.019 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".