Power strain imaging based on vibro-elastography techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes a new ultrasound elastography technique, power strain imaging, based on vibro-elastography (VE) techniques. With this method, tissue is compressed by a vibrating actuator driven by low-pass or band-pass filtered white noise, typically in the 0-20 Hz range. Tissue displacements at different spatial locations are estimated by correlation-based approaches on the raw ultrasound radio frequency signals and recorded in time sequences. The power spectra of these time sequences are computed by Fourier spectral analysis techniques. As the average of the power spectrum is proportional to the squared amplitude of the tissue motion, the square root of the average power over the range of excitation frequencies is used as a measure of the tissue displacement. Then tissue strain is determined by the least squares estimation of the gradient of the displacement field. The computation of the power spectra of the time sequences can be implemented efficiently by using Welch's periodogram method with moving windows or with accumulative windows with a forgetting factor. Compared to the transfer function estimation originally used in VE, the computation of cross spectral densities is not needed, which saves both the memory and computational times. Phantom experiments demonstrate that the proposed method produces stable and operator-independent strain images with high signal-to-noise ratio in real time. This approach has been also tested on a few patient data of the prostate region, and the results are encouraging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".