Attenuation of hyperalgesia in a rat model of neuropathic pain after intrathecal pre- or post-treatment with a neurokinin-1 antagonist
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although many studies have demonstrated a role for substance P in pain, there have been conflicting reports implicating the involvement of substance P in neuropathic pain models. In this study, the non-peptide neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor antagonist, L-732,138 was chronically administered by intrathecal (i.t.) injection to rats with mono-neuropathy produced by sciatic nerve constriction. Rats exhibited tactile allodynia and cold hyperalgesia over a 16-day testing period. L-732,138 (5-200 nmol) administered i.t. prior to and for 3 consecutive days post-surgery attenuated the mechanical allodynia and cold hyperalgesia on days 4 and 8 post-surgery. The effects of i.t. L-732,138 were also determined in rats with established nerve injury-induced neuropathy. The NK-1 receptor antagonist was injected for 4 consecutive days starting on day 8 post-sciatic nerve injury. Administration of L-732,138 (5-200 nmol) i.t. produced both anti-allodynic and anti-hyperalgesic effects on day 12, but the effect was not permanent, as nociceptive thresholds were similar to controls by day 16. These results demonstrate that substance P is involved both in the induction and the maintenance of neuropathic pain and provides justification for the development and administration of substance P antagonists for the management of clinical neuropathic pain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".