Continuous extrusion of microcellular polycarbonate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Extruded microcellular foams have been obtained from mixtures of polycarbonate (PC) and n‐pentane. Cell diameters were in the range of 2 to 5 μm and the foam densities varied between 400 and 700 kg/m3. Although two types of PC have been investigated, one linear and one branched, the presence of side branchings did not modify the extruded foam characteristics. Use of carbon dioxide as the blowing agent was also attempted, and cell sizes below 10 μm have been successfully obtained. One prerequisite for microcellular foaming was believed to consist in a concentration of the blowing agent close to its limit of solubility as that defined under the actual processing conditions of pressure and temperature. This hypothesis was validated from the observation of extrusion of regular PC foams (intermediate to low densities and cell sizes ranging between 100 μm and 1 mm) using moderate concentrations of blowing agents, and from solubility and viscosity measurements on similar polymer/blowing agent systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".