Amy-Jill Levine and Marc Zvi Brettler, Eds. The Jewish Annotated New Testament
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Jewish Annotated New Testament is a landmark publication, not only for what it accomplishes but also-perhaps more importantly-for what it represents.Annotated versions of the Christian Bible have a long tradition and are widely available; The New Oxford Annotated Bible (to stay within the same publishing house) is a well-known example.Also available from Oxford is The Jewish Study Bible, based on the Jewish Publication Society's translation of the Tanakh.Both volumes contain the biblical text in English translation, together with other elements of the genre: introductions to each book; section-by-section notes and comments at the bottom or side of each page; maps and charts (and, in the case of the NOAB, short sidebar notes); and longer explanatory essays on various topics.It is surely not a coincidence that one of the editors of both the NOAB and the JSB was Marc Zvi Brettler, the co-editor (along with Amy-Jill Levine) of The Jewish Annotated New Testament.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".