MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040389111 · doi:10.3106/mammalstudy.29.65

Growth, development and maintenance of American water shrews (Sorex palustris) in captivity

2004· article· en· W2040389111 on OpenAlexafffund
Roman W. Gusztak, Kevin L. Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueMammal Study · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsShrewCaptivityLitterBiologyInsectivoraAnimal scienceGestationLactationGestation periodSorexZoologyEcologyPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper documents a cost-effective method for the long-term housing and maintenance of water shrews. Wild-caught American water shrews (Sorex palustris) were successfully maintained in this set up for up to 2 years, suggesting a maximum lifespan of 28 months for this species in captivity. In addition, we describe the postnatal growth and development of S. palustris based on data collected from two litters born in captivity, together with corresponding changes in maternal mass over the gestational and postpartum periods. Minimum gestation for this species is 21 days with neonatal mass at birth averaging 0.42 g (n = 3). This study recorded one of the fastest growth rates to date for any Sorex shrew (0.51 g/day), with body mass beginning to plateau by 23 days of age. During the last two weeks of pregnancy, body mass of one pregnant shrew increased from 16.0 to 22.8 g (0.45 g/day). Maternal mass quickly dropped by 5 to 7 g following birth. However, maternal body mass then gradually increased by ca. 20% during the 24 to 27 day lactation period, despite a >30 fold increase in litter mass over this same interval. Exposure of young to water was initiated on day 25 with only surface swimming occurring on this day. All shrews were observed diving the following day, and appeared to be fully proficient divers by 40 to 45 days of age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMammal StudySame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207