MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040416019 · doi:10.1142/s0218202511400021

PREDICTING PATTERN FORMATION IN PARTICLE INTERACTIONS

2011· article· en· W2040416019 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMicro and Nano Robotics
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPairwise comparisonDimension (graph theory)Manifold (fluid mechanics)Statistical physicsStability (learning theory)Particle systemStatistical mechanicsInverseParticle (ecology)Space (punctuation)Zero (linguistics)InstabilityMathematicsPhysicsClassical mechanicsComputer sciencePure mathematicsGeometryMechanicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large systems of particles interacting pairwise in d dimensions give rise to extraordinarily rich patterns. These patterns generally occur in two types. On one hand, the particles may concentrate on a co-dimension one manifold such as a sphere (in 3D) or a ring (in 2D). Localized, space-filling, co-dimension zero patterns can occur as well. In this paper, we utilize a dynamical systems approach to predict such behaviors in a given system of particles. More specifically, we develop a nonlocal linear stability analysis for particles uniformly distributed on a d - 1 sphere. Remarkably, the linear theory accurately characterizes the patterns in the ground states from the instabilities in the pairwise potential. This aspect of the theory then allows us to address the issue of inverse statistical mechanics in self-assembly: given a ground state exhibiting certain instabilities, we construct a potential that corresponds to such a pattern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it