Size Matters: Space/Time Tradeoffs to Improve GPGPU Applications Performance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
GPUs offer drastically different performance characteristics compared to traditional multicore architectures. To explore the tradeoffs exposed by this difference, we refactor MUMmer, a widely-used, highly-engineered bioinformatics application which has both CPU- and GPU-based implementations. We synthesize our experience as three high-level guidelines to design efficient GPU-based applications. First, minimizing the communication overheads is as important as optimizing the computation. Second, trading-off higher computational complexity for a more compact in-memory representation is a valuable technique to increase overall performance (by enabling higher parallelism levels and reducing transfer overheads). Finally, ensuring that the chosen solution entails low pre- and post-processing overheads is essential to maximize the overall performance gains. Based on these insights, MUMmerGPU++, our GPU-based design of the MUMmer sequence alignment tool, achieves, on realistic workloads, up to 4× speedup compared to a previous, highly optimized GPU port.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it