MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040567326 · doi:10.1103/physreve.64.026120

Adiabatic elimination and reduced probability distribution functions in spatially extended systems with a fluctuating control parameter

2001· article· en· W2040567326 on OpenAlexaff
François Drolet, Jorge Viñals

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAdiabatic processStatistical physicsFokker–Planck equationProbability distributionProbability density functionDistribution (mathematics)Distribution functionConditional probabilityMathematical analysisMathematicsQuantum mechanicsStatisticsDifferential equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We obtain the stationary probability distribution functions of the order parameter near onset for the one-dimensional real Ginzburg-Landau and Swift-Hohenberg equations with a fluctuating control parameter. A perturbative expansion in the intensity of the fluctuations leads to a hierarchy of Fokker-Planck equations for conditional probability distribution functions that relate components of the order parameter that evolve in different time scales. Successive integration leads to a Fokker-Planck equation for the slowest mode, which we solve analytically for the models studied. In all cases, the probability distribution function above onset is of the form P(A0) approximately A(delta)(0)e(-gammaA20), where A0 is the slow component of the order parameter and the values of delta and gamma depend explicitly on the intensity of the fluctuations. Knowledge of P(A0) allows the calculation of an effective bifurcation threshold and of the moments of A0 above threshold.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topicsSame topicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern FormationFrench-language works237,207