Eccrine Angiomatous Hamartoma: A Clinicopathological Study of 26 Cases
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Eccrine angiomatous hamartoma (EAH) is a rare benign cutaneous tumor characterized by the proliferation of eccrine glands and capillaries. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to summarize the clinicopathological characteristics of EAH. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients diagnosed with EAH from 1977 to 2012 in the Union Hospital, Wuhan, P.R. China, and the clinicopathological features were compared with the cases reported in the literature. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients with EAH were identified. The male:female ratio was 1.2:1. EAH most commonly presents as a solitary (80.8%) plaque (50.0%) on the lower extremities (61.5%). Most patients presented with hyperhidrosis localizing to the lesion. Although most patients did not have major pain or anatomic deformity, one patient had severe pain as well as difficulty walking and moving, necessitating leg amputation. The histopathological findings showed typical features of EAH. CONCLUSION: EAH is a rare but characteristically benign skin hamartomatous condition. In rare occasions it can be associated with severe structural and functional impairment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it