MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040616547 · doi:10.1063/pt.3.2284

Richard Ernest Azuma

2014· article· en· W2040616547 on OpenAlexaffabout
M. Wiescher, J.M. D’Auria, Peter Jackson

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Today · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Richard Ernest Azuma, professor emeritus at the University of Toronto and adjunct professor at the University of Notre Dame, died on 19 September 2013 in Toronto after fighting cancer for many years. Dick was a leading figure in low-energy nuclear physics and nuclear astrophysics; among his most notable contributions were to the identification of the nuclear halo in neutron-rich nuclei and the solution of the 12C(α,γ)16O reaction-rate problem.Richard Ernest AzumaPPT|High resolutionDick was born in Regina, Saskatchewan, on 18 April 1930. In the early years of World War II, his Japanese-born father lost his job and was interned for several years in a Canadian work camp. Dick remembered vividly the difficulties he had with his classmates during his early years: “Every second day, I got beaten up. . . . They used to form a circle around us and call us chinky Japs. I can still remember my father tending my blackened eyes and bloody nose, clenching his fist in anger because he could not do anything.” In 1942 Dick was kicked out of high school; he worked as a logger until 1944, when he was readmitted to high school in Vancouver, British Columbia. While there, he finished second in the provincial competitive exams.Admitted to the University of British Columbia, Dick received his BA degree in 1951 in physics and MA degree on a research project in nuclear physics in 1953. He then went to the University of Glasgow in Scotland and in 1959 received his PhD on lifetime measurements of excited states in nuclei, with Philip Ivor Dee as his adviser.After spending two more years at Glasgow, first as a postdoc then as a lecturer, Dick returned to Canada in 1961 to be an assistant professor of physics at the University of Toronto. Initially, he extended his research into the properties of excited states of nuclei and radiative capture reactions with a 3-MV Van de Graaff generator and an eager group of other young faculty members and graduate students. Following the timely arrival of Claus Rolfs as a postdoc in 1972, that effort developed quickly into a new program of measuring reactions of significance for stellar hydrogen burning. Dick was one of the first to apply R-matrix theory to simulate the reaction cross section of low-energy nuclear reactions, an effort that became a lifelong passion.During a sabbatical at CERN’s ISOLDE radioactive ion-beam facility in 1978, Dick was a leading participant in a groundbreaking study of beta-delayed neutron emission from lithium-11. That study opened a new field in nuclear structure and radioactive-beam physics involving neutron halos. Dick’s insight helped identify the multineutron component of the decay.Dick also recognized new research opportunities at Chalk River Laboratories and later at TRIUMF in Vancouver. At Chalk River he and his students worked with John Hardy on aspects of weak interactions, including a precise measurement of beta–neutrino angular correlations via beta-delayed particle decay, not to mention Q-value and half-life measurements to unprecedented precision for superallowed beta.From 1982 to 1987, while serving as chair of Toronto’s physics department, Dick helped establish at TRIUMF a strong experimental group that included faculty members, postdocs, and students from the university. The group concentrated on intermediate-energy proton-scattering experiments as a new probe for nuclear structure, complemented by (p,n) reaction studies to determine the Gamow–Teller strength of the weak interaction. On the basis of the group’s work, by the end of 1988 the University of Toronto had become an associate member of TRIUMF, an early step in the evolution of TRIUMF from a joint venture of four local universities to a national facility.A sabbatical at Caltech brought Dick back to nuclear astrophysics; he focused on the 12C(α,γ)16O reaction rate, which William Fowler had called the field’s holy grail. The reaction determines the carbon–oxygen ratio in our universe, the fate of stars, and the explosion of supernovae. Many groups have tried for decades to solve the enigma of the complex interference pattern that determines the 12C(α,γ)16O reaction rate. Dick and his collaborators pursued two fundamental measurements to cut the Gordian knot: At TRIUMF, they measured the beta-delayed alpha decay of 16N and identified the E1 contribution; at the University of Notre Dame, they made the precision measurement of the α + 12C elastic scattering pattern and set limits on the reaction’s E2 component.After retiring from the University of Toronto in 1998, Dick accepted an adjunct faculty position at Notre Dame, where, with the help of many students, he focused on analyzing all 12C(α,γ)16O reaction contributions. He developed a novel R-matrix approach capable of simultaneously fitting all reaction channels. His computational code, AZURE, provides a meaningful description for the 12C(α,γ)16O reaction rate and finds ready application in other questions in nuclear astrophysics. Dick did not live to see the final result published, but those who work in the field know and recognize his contributions to the understanding of the more than 50-year-old problem that now seems solved.Dick was a great mentor and friend; an excellent teacher with infectious enthusiasm, he was a strong supporter of his students. The community will miss him greatly.© 2014 American Institute of Physics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics TodaySame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207