CsgD, a regulator of curli and cellulose synthesis, also regulates serine hydroxymethyltransferase synthesis in Escherichia coli K-12
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The homologous CsgD and AgfD proteins are members of the FixJ/UhpA/LuxR family and are proposed to regulate curli (thin aggregative fibres) and cellulose production by Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, respectively. A plasmid containing part of the csgD gene was isolated during a screen for multicopy suppressors of glycine auxotrophy caused by deleting the folA gene in E. coli. The sequence of the plasmid suggests it encodes a chimaeric protein. Plasmids containing the intact csgD or agfD gene also caused suppression. Cells transformed with the recombinant plasmids contained higher serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT) activity than controls. The increase could also be monitored by assaying beta-galactosidase activity from a reporter strain with part of the SHMT gene, glyA, fused to lacZ. The increase in SHMT activity was sufficient to correct the glycine auxotrophy of strains lacking folA. The recombinant plasmids also enabled K-12 strains that are not curli-proficient to make curli. Curlin, the major component of curli, contains more glycine than normal E. coli proteins. It is proposed that CsgD upregulates glyA to facilitate synthesis of curli. It is suggested that recombinant plasmids produce enough CsgD or chimaeric protein to titrate out a ligand that switches CsgD into its inactive form. As a result, sufficient active CsgD is present to activate genes in its regulon. It is concluded that CsgD increases expression of the glyA gene either directly or indirectly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".