MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040630216 · doi:10.1049/el.2013.2802

Modelling IEEE 802.15.6 slotted Aloha in heterogeneous condition

2014· article· en· W2040630216 on OpenAlexaff
Md. Shahnur Azad Chowdhury, Kazi Ashrafuzzaman, Kyung Sup Kwak

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics Letters · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlohaComputer scienceComputer networkProtocol (science)Inter-Access Point ProtocolNetwork allocation vectorThroughputIEEE 802.11Wireless networkIEEE 802.11sHeterogeneous networkMedia access controlWirelessWi-FiTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The IEEE 802.15.6 standard for wireless body area network (WBAN) includes a slotted Aloha based protocol as an option for contention based medium access control. This protocol is different from the long studied classical version in that it has inherent considerations for certain priorities of users. An analytical model is presented for saturation throughput with this protocol in a network that is heterogeneous in user priorities. The model is validated against simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score0.746

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronics LettersSame topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207