MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040640759 · doi:10.3917/dia.200.0037

La fidélité dans le couple et ses avatars

2013· article· fr· W2040640759 on OpenAlexaff
Gérard Bonnet

Bibliographic record

VenueDialogue · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsThe Alberta Paraplegic Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La fidélité est d’abord un idéal, dans lequel certaines personnes trouvent un plaisir privilégié et qui, comme tel, constitue un vecteur du désir. Cet idéal prend des proportions très différentes selon qu’il se présente comme un besoin narcissique, un avantage utilitaire ou une obligation sociale, mais il est vraiment efficace lorsqu’il constitue un idéal fondamental hérité des relations premières. Cela n’est possible qu’à certaines conditions telles que la référence au père, l’attachement à certains objets symboliques, la valorisation du lien pour lui-même. Les personnes souhaitant établir un lien de couple durable ont tout intérêt à rencontrer des personnes partageant le même idéal, en évitant de le projeter a priori en l’autre, ce qui risque d’en faire une source d’esclavage ou d’aliénation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDialogueSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207