MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040690592 · doi:10.1155/2007/60916

A Finite-Interval Uniqueness Theorem for Bilateral Laplace Transforms

2007· article· en· W2040690592 on OpenAlexafffund
Patrick Chareka

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
FundersSt. Francis Xavier University
KeywordsMathematicsLaplace transformTwo-sided Laplace transformInterval (graph theory)Laplace transform applied to differential equationsMathematical analysisUniquenessLaplace–Stieltjes transformContext (archaeology)Moment (physics)Function (biology)Mellin transformIntegrable systemGreen's function for the three-variable Laplace equationPure mathematicsInverse Laplace transformFourier transformCombinatoricsFourier analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two or more bilateral Laplace transforms with a complex argument “ s ” may be equal in a finite vertical interval when, in fact, the transforms correspond to different functions. In this article, we prove that the existence of a bilateral Laplace transform in any finite horizontal interval uniquely determines the corresponding function. The result appears to be new as we could not find it in the literature. The novelty of the result is that the interval need not contain zero, the function need not be nonnegative and need not be integrable. The result has a potential to be useful in the context of fitting probability distributions to data using Laplace transforms or moment generating functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.615
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical SciencesSame topicFinancial Risk and Volatility ModelingFrench-language works237,207